Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Friday, November 22, 2013
Bill of Right as a US Citizen
I have the right to demand my govt:
· * to put the people before their political
advancement
· * to follow the laws they impose on the people
· * to secure the boarder from criminals who cross
it illegally
· * not to have a secret court that imposes
procedure that infringe upon the rights of the citizens.
· * to scrutinize those people who apply for visa to
live in the US
· * not to choose one belief system over another
· * to leave decisions for my family and children in
my hands.
· * to balance its budget (No Deficits)
· * not to give foreign countries money without a
90% approval vote from Congress
· * doesn’t regulate the education of my children
· * must have oversight and enforcement of fraud
with the misappropriation of taxpayer funds.
· * Not to create a entitlement programs without the
major vote by the people
· * The president cannot lie to or use “Plausible
Deniability” in regards to National issues
· * That no govt family member can be a lobbyist or lobbyist can have special treatment by govt
· * Any govt official (Senator, Congressman,
Director, etc) under investigation of fraud, must be suspended and if convicted
fired without financial benefit from position
Bill of Right against being called a Racist
· * I have the right to disagree with anyone
· * I have the right to point out pool lifestyle
choice by others
· * I have the right to show the ignorance of others
· * I have the right to demand equal treatment for
all
· * I have the right to use the same slang as others
· * I have the right to not to be labeled by false propaganda
created by those who push an agenda
· * I have the right to live without fear of being called a racist
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Is New York City Mayor/elect Bill de Blasio the downfall of that city?
De Blasio’s team
·
Nick
Baldick, Campaign Consultant – worked Clinton campaign 1996
·
Berta Lewis – Founder of Working Families Party
( created in 1998, a coalition of labor unions, Association of Community
Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and other community organizations)
·
Patrick Gaspard, best friend – Former leader of
SEIU Healthcare workers
·
Jonathan Rosen, Lead Communication and Police
Strategist – PR for ACORN
·
Bob Master – Political Director for the Communication
Worker of America union
·
George Gresham – President of SEIU 1199
·
Dominic Williams, chief of Staff – Obama campaign
veteran and union advisor
·
Harold Ickes – Deputy Chief of Staff in the
Clinton White House
·
Anna Greenberg , Chief Pollster – Pollster for
Clinton
·
Jim Crounse, Consultant – Hillary Clinton for
Senate 2000 campaign
-
So he has the former Clinton, ACORN, Union and
Obama workers…. New York City is screwed!
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
The Problem with Govt
The
Problem with Govt
Senate:
·
33
Senators are older that the retirement age of 67 years old
·
Average length of time in seat is 20 years
Congress
·
73
Congressmen are older than retirement age of 67 years old
·
Congressman with the longest time in seat is 57
years (Rep. John Dingell, (D-MI)
·
34 Congressmen who began their position in the
1970s &1980s
Note:
·
If we had
a age or term limit on Congressmen or Senators, we would not have:
·
Senators
o
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
o
Chuck Grassley (R-IA_
o
Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
o
Carl Levin (D-MI)
o
John McCain (R-AZ)
o
Harry Reid (D – NV)
o
Pat Leahy (D-VT)
o
Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
o
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
o
Max Baucus (D-MT)
o
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
o
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
·
Congressmen
o
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
o
Henry Waxman (D-CA)
o
Maxine Waters (D-CA)
o
Snader Levin (D-MI)
o
John Dingell (D-MI)
o
John Conyers (D-MI)
o
Peter King (R-NY)
o
Charlie Rangel (D-NY)
Sunday, July 28, 2013
When The President misleads the US Economy… In the Shadow of Social Inequality
Obama Says Income Gap Is Fraying U.S. Social Fabric
JACKIE CALMES and MICHAEL D. SHEAR, New York Time, July 27,
2013
In a week when he tried to focus attention on the struggles
of the middle class, President Obama said in an interview that he was worried
that years of widening income inequality and the lingering effects of the
financial crisis had frayed the country’s social fabric and undermined
Americans’ belief in opportunity.
If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it
should be.
Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse,
because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get
scraps from a shrinking pot
The economy is “far stronger” than four years ago, he said,
yet many people who write to him still do not feel secure about their future,
even as their current situation recovers.
“I will seize any opportunity I can find to work with
Congress to strengthen the middle class, improve their prospects, improve their
security
The priority, he said, should be spending for
infrastructure, education, clean energy, science, research and other domestic
initiatives of the sort he twice campaigned on.
Common Sense Review
How can the American people confidently follow someone with
a ideas based in falsehoods, wrapped up in threats.
This man has the power to let the economy work itself out
without any interference from the govt.
Govt doesn’t create opportunity.
It creates regulation that hinders capitalism. Obama is the down fall of the American capital
system. Yet he threatens that if there
is no equal opportunity for the minorities to get jobs when there are no jobs
available. Your legislation of Obamacare
and Stimulus is the over taxation of the middle class which closes the door for
opportunity for all class and races.
Mr. President get out of the way!
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Judge Halts Groin Searches at Guantánamo, Calling Them Abhorrent to Muslims
CHARLIE SAVAGE; July 11, 2013, New York Times
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the military to stop
touching the groins of detainees at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, when
they are moved from their cells to speak with lawyers. The procedure had led
some prisoners to stop meeting with or calling their lawyers.
In a 35-page opinion, Judge Royce C. Lamberth, the chief
judge of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, called the
searches — which included guards wedging their hands between the genitals and
thighs of the detainees as many as four times when moving them to a meeting and
back to their cells — “religiously and culturally abhorrent” to Muslims. He
portrayed the procedure as unnecessary and intended to “actively discourage”
meetings with lawyers.
He also directed the military to allow detainees who are
weak from hunger strikes to meet with their lawyers in the same buildings in
which they are housed
Colonel Bogdan introduced the new procedures in May, after a
raid in which guards forced protesting detainees into lockdown in their
individual cells. After the raid, officials said they found improvised weapons.
In putting the policy into place, the colonel cited the risk of such weapons as
well as the case of a detainee who committed suicide in September by swallowing
an overdose of medication, raising speculation that he had hoarded the pills in
his underwear.
Common Sense Review
The atmosphere of
“we must treat those who want to kill us better than they would treat us” need
to go. The detention centers (prisons)
were created to house those who have chosen to commit crimes against
society. Yet they protection overrides
the soldiers who guard them from hurting other prisoner and guards. This judge has decided that they cannot not
do this… What?!?
As well as, detainees who have chosen to be on a hunger
strike must be allowed to have their lawyer to come into their housing
barracks. Why can’t people choose to
harm themselves without interference? I
find this act disrespecting their wishes.
Now don’t get me wrong, the guards shouldn’t give in to their demands
due to the hunger strike but the detainees should get special treatment.
If you want the patients running the asylum, why don’t we
put these terrorist on a island in the middle of nowhere and they figure out to
protect themselves and their rights to a civil existence.
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Boston bombing suspect cites U.S. wars as motivation, officials say
Wall Street Journal, Scott Wilson, Greg Miller and Sari
Horwitz, 04/23/12
The 19-year-old suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings has
told interrogators that the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan motivated him
and his brother to carry out the attack, according to U.S. officials familiar
with the interviews.
From his hospital bed, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has acknowledged
his role in planting the explosives near the marathon finish line on April 15,
the officials said. The first successful large-scale bombing in the post-Sept.
11, 2001, era, the Boston attack killed three people and wounded more than 250
others.
The officials said, the evidence so far suggests they were “self-radicalized” through Internet sites and
U.S. actions in the Muslim world. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has specifically cited the
U.S. war in Iraq, which ended in December 2011 with the removal of the last
American forces, and in Afghanistan, where President Obama has made plans to
end combat operations by the end of 2014.
Common Sense Review
I am a believer in red flag intuition and this article is
full of red flags..
First if these two
are “self-radicalized” through internet sites… we need to question their mental
stability. We as adults know that
everything on the internet is not true.
But if you don’t have the mental capability to know the difference
between internet and reality should they be under a doctor’s care like schizophrenics. If these two are mentally challenged, then
wouldn’t his wife, sisters and mother be aware?
Second, Break down
the cost of pressure cookers, nail, bbs, ball bearings , gun power, grenades,
guns…. Wouldn’t someone in their family notice large sums of money coming out
of accounts? Or because they didn’t
work, where did the large sums of money come from?
Third, Pressure cookers are big. Wouldn’t someone ask “Hey Tamerlan, what is
up with all the pressure cookers?”. As
well as the gun powder, nails, bbs and ball bearings… If that didn’t red flag, “Gee
Tamerlan, why do you have grenades?”
Fourth, where do you learn to make Pressure Cooker bombs? I don’t believe there is a book “Bomb making
for Dummies” yet I could be wrong…
Fifth, if you are mad at the govt about combat in another
country… When does it enter your brain, “Let’s blow up runners in a Marathon?”….
“Gee killing that child will show the US govt”
If you don’t like the US in another country, fight on the battle ground…Killing
children are cowardly
Sixth, What piss poor bomber are you when you don’t research
the area you plan on attacking? In this
age of technology and security, not thinking that there is a possibly cameras
are not going to capture you image is a foolish mistake. How
many virgins do you get for being a bad bomber?
In my eyes, there is a group behind these two, who have
educated and funded this endeavor… Yet due to the ignorant mistakes, where does
the group go to a refund their money?
I’m just saying…
Sunday, April 21, 2013
US pledges to double Syrian aid to $250M, rebels want more
April 21, 2013, Associated Press
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/21/us-doubles-aid-to-syrian-rebels-who-want-more/
The United States said Sunday that it will double its non-lethal assistance to Syria's
opposition as the rebels' top supporters vowed to enhance and expand their
backing of the two-year battle to oust President Bashar Assad's regime.
Yet the pledge fell far short of what the opposition had
made clear it wanted: weapons and direct military intervention to stop the
violence that has killed more than 70,000 people. The Syrian National Coalition
had sought drone strikes on sites from which the regime has fired missiles, the
imposition of no-fly zones and protected humanitarian corridors to ensure the
safety of civilians.
The Obama administration's pledged to provide an additional
$123 million in aid, which may include for the first time armored vehicles,
body armor, night vision goggles and other defensive military supplies.
The additional aid, which brings total non-lethal U.S.
assistance to the opposition to $250 million since the fighting began,
"underscores the United States' firm support for a political solution to
the crisis in Syria and for the opposition's advancement of an inclusive,
tolerant vision for a post-Assad Syria," he said.
Common Sense Review
Here in America, we are fighting a war against rebels who
want to kill us and our way of life. Yet
we fight our govt to keep us safe by funding border patrol, enforcing our laws
and freeing the American citizens by supporting their rights to defend
themselves.
In this time of the American govt in debt up to their eye
brows, they borrow money to give to another country to fight against their
rebel populous.
We need to stabilize our country before we donate to another
country…
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Studying the Brain or Eugenics based on the brain’s function
The New York Times , 02/18/2013
The Obama administration is planning a decade-long
scientific effort to examine the workings of the human brain and build a
comprehensive map of its activity, seeking to do for the brain what the Human Genome Project did for
genetics.
The project holds the potential of paving the way for
advances in artificial intelligence.
The project, which could ultimately cost billions of
dollars, is expected to be part of the president’s budget proposal next month.
And, four scientists and representatives of research institutions said they had
participated in planning for what is being called the Brain Activity Map project.
The initiative, if successful, could provide a lift for the
economy. “The Human Genome Project was on the order of about $300 million a
year for a decade,” said George M. Church, a Harvard University molecular
biologist who helped create that project and said he was helping to plan the
Brain Activity Map project.
Scientists involved in the planning said they hoped that
federal financing for the project would be more
than $300 million a year, which if approved by Congress would amount to at
least $3 billion over the 10 years.
The initiative will be organized by the Office of Science
and Technology Policy, according to scientists who have participated in
planning meetings.
Common Sense Reivew
If this doesn’t freak you out… this article makes this sound
warm and fuzzy yet a little info about the
Human Genome Project, they bring up these questions:
Societal Concerns Arising from the New Genetics
Project goals:
· * identify all the approximately 20,000-25,000
genes in human DNA,
· * determine the sequences of the 3 billion
chemical base pairs that make up human DNA,
· * store
this information in databases,
· * improve tools for data analysis,
· * transfer related technologies to the private
sector, and
· * address the ethical, legal, and social issues
(ELSI) that may arise from the project.
http://ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/elsi.shtml
·
Fairness in the use of genetic information by
insurers, employers, courts, schools, adoption agencies, and the military,
among others.
Who should have access
to personal genetic information, and how will it be used?
·
Privacy
and confidentiality of genetic information.
Who owns and controls
genetic information?
·
Reproductive
issues including adequate informed consent for complex and potentially
controversial procedures, use of genetic information in reproductive decision
making, and reproductive rights.
Do healthcare personnel
properly counsel parents about the risks and limitations of genetic
technology?
How reliable and
useful is fetal genetic testing?
What are the larger
societal issues raised by new reproductive technologies?
·
Clinical
issues including the education of doctors and other health service providers,
patients, and the general public in genetic capabilities, scientific
limitations, and social risks; and implementation of standards and
quality-control measures in testing procedures.
How do we prepare the
public to make informed choices?
How do we as a society
balance current scientific limitations and social risk with long-term benefits?
·
Commercialization of products including property
rights (patents, copyrights, and trade secrets) and accessibility of data and
materials.
Who owns genes and
other pieces of DNA?
Will patenting DNA
sequences limit their accessibility and development into useful products?
I know this sound like a SyFy movie. Yet from the lessons we have learn from
Margret Sanger and Hilter, there are those out there who want to put us in
categories and eliminate those they don’t like.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)