The New York Times
06/11/12 Kate Taylor
“At Black Church, Mayor Says Stop-and-Frisk Policy ‘Saves
Lives’”
As criticism of the Police Department’s so-called
stop-and-frisk policy grows louder, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg took to the
pulpit before a black congregation in Brooklyn on Sunday to make his most
forceful and nuanced defense of the practice yet, arguing that it had helped
make New York the safest big city in the country, while acknowledging that the
police needed to treat those whom they stopped wi In the city as a whole, the police stopped people and questioned
them 684,330 times last year, a 600 percent increase from Mr. Bloomberg’s first
year in office. Eighty-seven percent of those stopped were black or Latino,
and the vast majority were young men, which has led some minority leaders to
denounce the policy as a form of racial profiling.
Mr. Bloomberg said Sunday that racial profiling was banned
by the Police Department, and that “we will not tolerate it.” He added,
however, that the city would not “deny reality” in order to stop different
groups according to their relative proportions in the population. (He used the
examples of men versus women and young versus old people, rather than white
versus black or Hispanic.)
Some critics have pointed out that, as the number of stops
increased, the percentage in which guns were found diminished. Last year, the police seized 780 guns, suggesting
that guns were recovered in roughly one in 1,000 stops.
Common Sense Review
This is another power grab of personal liberty under the
veil of societal safety.
The article focuses on the aspect of racial profiling yet it
is greater than that. It is pushing the
Constitutional right against illegal search and seizure. The police cannot just
stop you and frisk without probable cause which infringe on personal liberty.
Yet Bloomberg is not concerned with personal liberties.
Bloomberg says the police have to do this to secure public
safety. However, out of the 684,330 they have found 780 guns last year. Those are not good odds. There are reasons for the Constitution is so
the govt doesn’t overreach their authority in people’s lives.
87% of those searchs were of black and Hispanic people, yet
all were Americans (my assumption). The
Constitution overrides any societal theory of unethical police practice. So New York citizens should protest on racial
profiling but on the unconstitutionality of the practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment